Saturday, 18 July 2015

Journey Through the Baltic States

By David Gourley

Cathy and I commenced serious travel in 1987.  The Cold War was by now drawing to a close but we didn’t know that then.  So I never dreamt that one day we’d be strolling back and forth through the Brandenburg Gate, where the Berlin Wall had once stood, or that we’d visit a Prague that was once more the capital of a free country - or that we’d visit the independent states of Estonia, Latvia and Lithuania.  Not long after the collapse of the Soviet Union we were in New York and visited the United Nations.  In the General Assembly Hall we observed the name plates for the three Baltic States.   In my travel diary I wrote “who would have thought? ......”

Tallinn
The three countries are often bracketed together.  They are after all smallish entities, located side by side along the eastern littoral of the Baltic Sea.  But it’s not just that: their histories over the last century have been very similar, and for all too much of that time tragic.

Formerly part of the Tsarist Empire, the Baltic States, along with Finland to the north, managed to break away after the Bolshevik Revolution.   Alas they were to find themselves sandwiched between two voracious neighbours who would not leave other countries alone: Hitler’s Germany and Stalin’s Soviet Union.  Under the infamous Molotov-Ribbentrop pact, the two dictators carved the region up between them, with the Soviet Union thus awarded the Baltic States and Finland as well as a slice of Poland.  The Finns gave Stalin a bloody nose but the Baltic States were invaded and incorporated into the Soviet Union.  But it was not long before Hitler launched Operation Barbarossa and thus seized vast swathes of the Soviet Union, including the three Baltics.  The Soviets returned in 1944 – and stayed for the next 47 years.

Riina, our lovely Estonian guide who accompanied us on tour through the Baltics, told us that there was some superstition surrounding the period of 22 years, the duration of independence first time round.  This was 2011 and the countries had been independent for 20 years.  Now it is 2014 – phew!  At the time of our visit there was in fact no reason to think that the Russians posed any threat.  It is true that the Estonians blamed the Russians – without having any hard evidence – for the cyber-attack in 2007 that played havoc with the country’s IT (the country is sometimes known as e-Estonia as it has embraced IT so enthusiastically that it is in this respect one of the most advanced in the world).  But a land invasion was surely unthinkable. 

But now, with Russia having just helped itself to a chunk of Ukraine, the Baltics are feeling somewhat jittery.   A result of the Soviet occupation is that at time of independence, around 40% of the population of Estonia, and an even greater percentage in Latvia, were of Russian origin and, as in Ukraine,  Putin appears to see it as his mission to  “protect” Russian speaking people in former Soviet states. The Baltics have though joined both the EU and NATO, the latter founded on the principle of an attack on one member being an attack on all, so have their own powerful protectors.  Estonia, and more recently Latvia, have also joined the Eurozone; apparently Lithuania is thinking about it. 

Whilst in the geopolitical sense the Baltics are very similar, one should remember that these are separate, and very different, countries.  For example the Latvians and Lithuanians combine to form a unique ethnic and linguistic group whereas the Estonians are close kinsfolk of the Finns and are more distantly related to the Hungarians.  On the other hand Estonia and Latvia are Lutheran whereas Lithuania is staunchly Catholic.  Pre-1918, Lithuania had had a previous existence as an independent state, latterly in union with Poland, whereas the other two had never been nation states. 

Our tour started in Tallinn (Estonia), continuing through Riga (Latvia) to Vilnius (Lithuania).  We were thus more or less following the route of the human chain that, in the perestroika era, when people in the Baltics dared to start hoping that freedom could be regained, had linked the three capitals.  We had been to Estonia before, a weekend break ten years previously.   This was in the middle of winter and normal people might have headed south.  But what’s so great about being normal?  The beauty of Tallinn was enhanced by the light covering of snow. We had not been to Latvia or Lithuania.  We had three nights in Tallinn and two nights each in the other capitals.

Our hotel in Tallinn was the Meriton Grand, located just outside the historic centre.   It was only when we went out for a post-dinner stroll and thought the surroundings looked rather familiar that the penny dropped: this was the same hotel where we’d stayed in 2001.  Strange as it might seem, we hadn’t realized.  In those days it was known simply as the Grand.  Estonia of all the former Soviet countries was the most westernized, even so there was still something of a Soviet-era feel about the hotel.  It was practically empty yet we were assigned a room with a view of the car park.  We managed to get ourselves moved to a room which gave a magical view of the floodlit Toompea Castle, which houses the country’s parliament.  The catering left much to be desired.  For breakfast I tried some porridge.  I have never eaten Dickensian gruel but would hazard a guess that this is what it tasted like.  Now, some ten years on, the hotel was transformed.  There was a good, if somewhat quirky, Russian restaurant, Balalaika – and they served decent porridge.

We had a full day in Tallinn, divided between a walking tour in the morning and free time in the afternoon.  We had a local guide for the tour, another lovely lady who was maybe a few years older us.  Like Riina and our guide in Riga (but not the one in Vilnius) she spoke movingly of her country’s history and the experience of Soviet occupation.  She wanted to disabuse us of the widespread notion that people in the Baltics ‘preferred’ the Nazis to the Communists: “how does one choose between smallpox and bubonic plague?”

I was amazed, when I read through the feedback section of our tour company’s website, that some old bloke was moaning about how “wearing” it was to hear the local guides talking about the history of their countries which, he dismissively added, was “pretty much the same”.  I have a masters in Slavonic and Eastern European History so I would be interested, wouldn’t I, but surely any intelligent layman would be?  This chap should count himself lucky that he grew up under the benign rule of the Harolds, Macmillan and Wilson, rather than under the rule of the heirs of Stalin. 

We headed past Toompea Castle, not alas open to the public, and the huge Orthodox Cathedral, the Alexander Nevsky church.  We’d spent a bit of time there last time, attending for part of a service – it’s fine in an Orthodox church to go in and out for services tend to be very long and one stands up throughout.  I thought it was all a bit ritualistic and preferred the exuberance of the Lutheran service we attended, which veered towards ‘happy clappy’.  Cathy took the opposite view.  A former client had mischievously sent our guide an Observer travel piece which informed the reader that “all Estonians love the Alexander Nevsky church”.  Not true: its worshippers come from the Russian speaking population and it is thus, for native Estonians, a symbol of rule from Moscow.

Tallinn is a lovely city, one of the finest in Europe, full of nooks and crannies and wonderful old buildings, its centre being the beautiful Old Town Square.  Something that had surprised me about Tallinn, during our previous visit, is it doesn’t have the look or feel of a maritime city.  The only time we saw the sea was when we went to a viewing point.  In this respect is quite different from its neighbour across the Gulf of Finland, Helsinki, where the sea is very much a presence. 

In the afternoon we took a tram, as we had done the previous time, to Kadriorg Park, a mile or so east of the centre.  Here one finds the Presidential Palace and a number of museums.  We were this time able to visit Peter the Great’s House, which had been closed last time as we were out of season.  It is small so there’s not a lot to see but its historic significance of course makes a visit well worthwhile.  Peter evidently had a great liking for Reval, as Tallinn was then known, and even toyed with the idea of making it his capital.  Estonians are no doubt grateful that he instead decided to create a new city, St Petersburg, on the marshes of Ingria, which like Estonia was land he’d conquered from the Swedes. 

We got the tram back and stepped out into torrential rain which persisted as we made our way through the historic centre to our hotel on the other side.  I was not thrilled.   But Cathy thoroughly enjoyed the walk, her dictum being that there’s no such thing as wrong weather, just wrong clothes.  But the rain did force a rethink about where we would dine that evening.  We’d planned to return to Balthazar’s, a restaurant in Old Town Square that specializes in garlic dishes, as we’d had good meals there previously.  We postponed this to the next evening and settled for another evening meal in Balalaika.

We had a full day excursion to the Lahemaa National Park, a chance at last to see something of Estonia beyond its capital.  The Park lies about halfway to the Russian border.  We passed through Lasnamae, which is on the eastern edge of the city, beyond the reach of the trams and trolleybuses and not much visited by tourists.  Yet approx. a third of Tallinn’s residents live there.  Its functional architecture is a product of the Soviet era, dating back more specifically to the Moscow Olympics when Tallinn hosted the maritime events, rather as Weymouth did during the London Olympics.

Tallinn was in a way the Soviet Union’s “Window on the West” rather as St Petersburg was during the time of Peter the Great and his successors.  But whereas Peter wanted to embrace western ideas the Soviet leaders wanted to keep them out.  However they could not totally succeed.  Tallinn was after all geographically close to the West, with Finland lying just fifty miles or so across the Gulf.  There was little the authorities could do to stop people listening to Finnish radio: “we would listen to Soviet radio”, our local guide told us, “and then tune to Helsinki so we could learn the truth”.  Estonia, like the other Baltic States, had a shorter period under Soviet   rule than most of the other Soviet Socialist Republics and the standard of living was relatively high, though far lower than in Finland albeit before WW2 it had been roughly the same level in the two countries.  After independence, Estonia straight away formed strong ties with Finland and Sweden; indeed Tallinn has been described as the sixth Scandinavian capital though that is rather pushing the bounds of geography. 

Our tour of the National Park took in a small waterfall.  We had just a few months previously been to Niagara so maybe weren’t as impressed as we were expected to be!  We spent some time in the Palmse Manor, whose various exhibits include a fascinating music machine.  A tasty lunch was enjoyed in the agreeably rustic surrounds of its restaurant.  Our return journey took us through a number of coastal villages.  We dined as planned in Balthazar’s.  Nothing really to complain about: good food in lovely surroundings and friendly staff.  Yet I wondered if, having now been successfully established for a number of years, it was resting on its laurels a bit.  Most of the main dishes seemed to have garlic bulbs just as an accompaniment whereas we love garlic and wanted it to be an integral part of the cooking.  They were still though serving the garlic ice cream that I’d enjoyed last time.  The ice cream is not actually made with garlic, rather it is served with a garlic and honey sauce.  Trust me on this: it works.

We headed the next day to Riga.  Looking at the map I had assumed we would be alongside the sea for much of the way but, a bit disappointingly, we were for nearly all the time slightly inland.  Even in Parnu, which is known as Estonia’s Summer Capital, there was not a sight of the sea.  We had about an hour in this rather dull town.  We tried to find the main attraction, the Red Tower, an initiative test which we failed.   We recommenced our journey and then discovered that Parnu does after all have a beach, but it’s about a ten minute drive from the main centre. 

Crossing the Latvian border, Riina recalled that, in the early days of independence, the Baltics erected checkpoints on their borders whereas “in our friendly Soviet Union” there were no such barriers.  Subsequently, all three countries have adhered to the Schengen Agreement so the checkpoints have come down. 

As we drove into Riga through somewhat unprepossessing suburbs we wondered, rather as we had done in Prague and in Seville, why this city is considered to one of Europe’s most beautiful.   We were to be convinced the following day that it is indeed beautiful.  Riina gave us a short taster after we’d checked in to our hotel, taking us past the striking Freedom Monument.  This depicts a lady who symbolizes Liberty and who holds three stars.  It was erected by the newly independent state to honour its war dead.   Amazingly, it might be thought, it survived the Soviet era.  The authorities’ spin on it, though obviously not that of the Latvian people, was that it depicted Mother Russia protecting the three Baltic republics.   It is customary for locals to lay flowers by the monument.  We spoke to a young couple who had just done so; they told us that that the lady is known to locals as Milda.

As in Tallinn, our full day in Riga was divided between a walking tour in the morning, again in the hands of an excellent local guide, and free time in the afternoon.  After a comprehensive tour, we had a good al fresco lunch near St Peter’s Church, which we afterwards ascended, getting a wonderful panoramic view of the city.  We used some of our free time to visit the Occupation Museum, which:

“shows what happened to Latvia, its land and its people, under two occupying totalitarian regimes from 1940 to 1991”

“reminds the world of the crimes committed by foreign powers against the state and people of Latvia”

“remembers the victims of the occupation: those who perished, were persecuted, forcefully deported or fled the terror of the occupation regimes”.

This was a moving experience.  I bought a book, There was such a Time, by Ilmar Knagis, who was born in 1926 and whom the Soviets exiled to Siberia, luckier than some since he wasn’t sent to a Gulag so could move around reasonably freely.  He founded the “Children of Siberia” foundation and organizes expeditions to places to which Latvians were deported.  It was not an easy read, perhaps because of the poor translation, but certainly worth persevering with.

Someone in our group had discovered that there was a garlic restaurant quite close to our hotel.  So that was our dinner for tonight sorted.   It was smaller and in less impressive surroundings than Balthazar’s but I thought it was more true to its purpose and we had a good meal.   Here dessert, a parfait, really was made with garlic rather than just accompanied by a garlic sauce.

We were back on the road the next day, heading for our third and last capital, Vilnius.  Still in Latvia we spent time at the Rundale Palace, impressive inside and out, and surrounded by gardens that are also impressive.  Another stop, just over the border, was at the Hill of Crosses.  This is as described, a remarkable and rather moving collection of crosses, covering a small hill and numbering 100,000 or more.  One traverses this via a pathway.  It’s a place of pilgrimage going back centuries.  Not surprisingly, the Communist authorities had no love for this place and tried more than once too dismantle it.  They didn’t succeed.  In 1993, soon after independence, Pope John Paul II visited the site, declaring it to be a place for hope, peace, love and sacrifice. 
Hill of Crosses

We carried on to the nearby city of Siauliai, Lithuania’s fourth largest and surely a rare example of a place name with eight letters but only two consonants.  We passed through the centre but our lunch stop was in a shopping mall on the outskirts.  We continued to Vilnius via the fast motor road.  The capital is located close to the border with another but very different former Soviet republic, Belarus.  This is the “last dictatorship in Europe”, pro-Russia and anti-West.  It is the only European country not to have signed the European Convention on Human Rights and the onetime KGB is now called – the KGB.

Lithuania does not actually have a border with the main part of Russia.  It does though border to the west that curious geopolitical entity, the Russian exclave of Kaliningrad (whose capital was until the end of WW2 part of Germany and known as  Königsberg), which is sandwiched between Lithuania and Poland.  These two fellow members of the EU and NATO were not always on friendly terms.  In the aftermath of WW1 the Poles captured Vilnius and incorporated it into their country.  Kaunas, now Lithuania’s second city, served as its capital.  The Soviets redrew the boundary after WW2.

Our tour company’s website had indicated that our hotel in Vilnius, the Amberton, was not of the same standard as those in the other two cities.  But we had no complaint: it enjoys an excellent location in Cathedral Square, right in the heart of the city; our unusually large room was pleasant; and the restaurant is sufficiently well thought of to attract locals as well as hotel residents.   As in Riga, Riina gave us a brief taster, taking us up the hill through the Old Town to the Town Hall.  She recommended a nearby restaurant, the historic Lokys.  We had dinner there.  Always interested in trying out exotic meats, I ordered, and enjoyed, beaver stew. 

Our walking tour the next morning was led by a local guide who dutifully delivered his spiel but made no real attempt to engage and did not talk about his country’s history.  From time to time he was on his mobile: it might be that there was some domestic issue for him to sort out but courtesy would have dictated an apology.  But this did not of course detract from our enjoyment of the Old Town, one of the largest surviving medieval towns in Europe.  Again we finished at the Town Hall.  We had an al fresco lunch in a restaurant halfway down the hill leading back to our hotel: Chicken Kiev accompanied by chips and what were described with commendable honesty as “tinned peas”. 

In the afternoon there was an included tour to Trakei Castle, a few miles west of the city and scenically located on an island in a lake.   According to our original itinerary our final morning was to have been free in Vilnius, with a flight home in the afternoon.  Unfortunately, direct flights between London and Vilnius were subsequently discontinued so we instead had to spend the morning flying to Riga, where we transferred to a direct flight.


 
 First Published in VISA 115 (June 2014)

No comments:

Post a Comment