Showing posts with label Angkor Wat. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Angkor Wat. Show all posts

Thursday, 9 April 2015

Cambodia and the Mekong Delta



by Janice Booth

I’ve just eaten the last of my Vietnamese peanut brittle, savouring each sweet, sticky mouthful. I’d watched it being stirred in a massive iron wok above a fire of rice husks, then poured into heavy trays, pressed flat and scored into sticks as it cooled. The smell of smoke, hot metal and bubbling palm sugar filled the long shed where it was made.

The holiday had begun in Cambodia, at Siem Reap, where my father had visited Angkor Wat in 1933. As a child I’d been entranced by his photos of the great temples and particularly their friezes: full of little carved faces with enchanting upward-tilted smiles. I’d always promised myself a trip, and this year the imminent doubling of my travel insurance (I’ve just turned 70) was the nudge I needed.

From London I stopped overnight in Bangkok, at the 3-star Miracle Hometel Suvarnabhumi. Strangely, there was a price list in my room for anyone wanting to buy the furnishings: for example bed-sheets 550 baht, ashtray 60 baht, ‘cloth hanger male’ and ‘cloth hanger female’ 150 baht. The hotel was comfortable and convenient – until my morning wake-up call didn’t materialise and I had a serious scramble to catch the shuttle back to the airport. However, I was so happy to be finally heading for Angkor Wat that it didn’t matter: I loved everyone and everything. The love dissipated slightly when the pilot announced that heavy rain might prevent our landing at Siem Reap, but after we’d circled a few times the clouds parted and down we went. A driver from my guesthouse was waiting and gave me my first of many big Cambodian smiles.

Temple tourism has turned Siem Reap into a large, busy town and the drive in from the airport doesn’t offer much excitement, but once we started twisting among little side-streets it livened up. Small houses and shops jostled together and cyclists festooned with bags and packages wobbled their way through muddy puddles. From the website www.angkorhotels.org I’d picked the Angkor Discover Inn at US$22 a night and it was ideal: peaceful and relatively new, traditionally built, with simple wooden rooms set back from the road in a shady garden. I fixed transport to the temples for the next day and then launched into Siem Reap and its cheery tuk-tuks (motorbike rickshaws). The ride to the central market took ten minutes; returning to the guesthouse in the dark took 45 as the driver didn’t know the town! ‘No plobrem!’ he kept reassuring me as he dismounted to ask yet another stall-holder for directions and then ‘No far’ as he chugged off on the next wild-goose-chase. It’s a measure of Siem Reap that I never felt anxious. ‘Tank you! Tank you!’ he beamed, when we finally arrived and I paid him.

The temples are astounding: their scale and quantity, the colossal work involved, the volume of carving, and the meticulous details of daily life – for example a man blowing the embers of a fire to life, dogs, cockfighting, women with children, fishing, and even a turtle biting a man’s backside. Military scenes abound, as do elephants – which, interestingly, have knees, whereas in early carvings in English churches they mostly don’t. Our sculptors had never seen one! The swarms of brightly dressed children hawking their postcards, scarves, bracelets and other souvenirs amid the massive stonework reminded me of butterflies fluttering against the trunk of some venerable oak. In fact many temples still have big trees rooted among their walls, as they did when Europeans first saw them in the 19th century. John Keeble’s Tales from theTemples (VISA 48) gives some good descriptions and background. Towering Angkor Wat and Angkor Thom, absolute treasure-houses of carvings, date from the 12th/13th centuries, not so far in time from the building of our own great cathedrals: on opposite sides of the globe, builders and stone-workers were exhibiting similar skills, devotion, and loving attention to detail.

Sixty years after enjoying my father’s photos I was still captivated by the faces, whether smiling shyly in the friezes or scanning the landscape with huge, ancient eyes from the temple towers. I’d brought some of the photos with me and people stroked them lovingly, spotting the changes and murmuring nostalgically about the past. I showed them to gardeners, guides, policemen, stallholders, local families, tuk-tuk drivers – and got big Cambodian smiles in return.

A taxi-drive out to a remote temple, Beng Melea, took me through the countryside: paddy fields stretching into the distance, and scattered wayside hamlets where the occasional stall of fruit or vegetables had been set up to catch passing traffic. The houses, mostly wooden, were built on stilts, giving them a useful extra living/storage area underneath. A ladder or thin staircase led up to the rooms. Scrawny dogs dozed, children played, and men sat repairing rusty bits of machinery.

I’m deliberately not talking politics in this piece, but my involvement with Rwanda’s tourism for the past decade made comparisons interesting. Two tiny countries, Cambodia with amazing temples and Rwanda with mountain gorillas, both rebuilding their tourism after genocide, both needing to diversify their attractions so that tourists stay longer: so far, very similar. The difference is that at least 5% of Rwanda’s tourist income from the national parks goes directly to finance small, rural enterprises, and practicalities like village water tanks. No-one could tell me of similar investment in Cambodia – and it’s needed. With around two million tourists in 2008, even a very small percentage of the temple fee (US$20 per day, $40 for 3 days, $60 for a week) could have achieved a lot.

Beforehand I’d also booked an eight-day riverboat cruise with Pandaw Cruises (see www.pandaw.com), down the Tonle Sap River and Mekong Delta to Ho Chi Minh City, preceded by two more days in Siem Reap. Now it was time to leave my guesthouse and hook up to Pandaw – and to a huge treat. Tourist numbers were low, so they’d decided to upgrade my hotel to the gorgeous Raffles Grand Hotel d’Angkor, supreme among Siem Reap hotels since 1933. Wow! Not at all my usual style, but I gulped bravely and adjusted to the deluxe bedroom, huge squashy bed, large swimming pool and delightful, friendly staff.

I loved Siem Reap, not just the amazing temples but also strolling and people-watching. The centre of town has plenty of Asian charm, the market is lively and there’s a pleasant tree-lined walk along the river. I found friendliness everywhere. There’s certainly poverty but also a sense of energy, of people doing their best to recover from the past and get on with their lives. I’ve seen the same in Rwanda. But now my riverboat was waiting and I had to leave.

The boat – the Tonle Pandaw – takes 60-odd passengers but there were just 16 of us: Aussies, Danish, Dutch, American and me, the only Briton. We piled into a coach for a four-hour drive to reach her. It poured the whole way – far too wet to stop and explore Skoun, the ‘spider capital’ where women sell crunchy roasted spiders from stalls beside the road. The Tonle Pandaw was moored alongside a muddy bank on the Tonle Sap River, to the amusement of locals whose homes were only a few yards away. I don’t do cruising normally but this was very laid back: no dressing up, no Captain’s table, no impressing the Jones-hyphen-Joneses. My tiny cabin was comfortable and the top deck gave wonderful views of the river as it gradually widened and grew busier. Small local craft with croaky outboard motors buzzed about among container barges and dredgers, and traditional canoes drifted gently by. Houses and temples peered out from the trees along the bank. We passed islands, some of them large enough to support small villages and farms. Other ‘villages’ floated on the river: ramshackle collections of houseboats containing homes, shops, markets, bars and workshops. Some of the homes had deep cages directly beneath them, for fish farming.

Most of each day was spent ashore, exploring. We visited towns, villages, markets, temples, and inevitably craft workshops. That’s where I bought my peanut brittle: they also made wonderful pop-rice (like popcorn but with rice grains popping and bouncing in a bed of red-hot sand) and carvings from local stone and wood. Once we strolled through paddy fields where villagers were busily transplanting rice seedlings. In Phnom Penh (where we rode in cyclo rickshaws) we went to the Royal Palace, still magnificent despite the looting of 60% of its treasures during Pol Pot’s era. I bought myself some traditional fisherman’s trousers in the Old Market; the stallholder and I had no common language but gestures go a long way! That night a sudden storm whipped up the river and waves splashed against my cabin’s porthole. One Khmer island village, Koh Deak Chor, had been visited by cruise passengers only once before so tourists were still a novelty. Villagers led us along the leafy paths to see their ‘cottage industry’ of making rice-flour noodles, much in demand on the mainland, as well as their breeding pens of tiny pink piglets. Their ‘shop’ was a woman on a bicycle, pedalling and peddling her load of vegetables, fish and meat. A child came running in from the paddy field to show us a bird’s nest she’d just found.

Then we crossed into Vietnam and very subtly the atmosphere changed: slightly brisker, slightly brasher, slightly more cosmopolitan – but the smiles were no less warm. Chau Doc was a bustling, lively town, with a huge street market selling all kinds of fish, meat and vegetables as well as snails, crabs, snakes, toads and crayfish – many of them still alive. Cu Lao Gian Island had a sad government-run home for old women, where we left little gifts of the free toiletries from our cabins and whatever else we didn’t need. In Sadec, we visited the ornate former home of Huyn Thuy Le, lover of French novelist Marguerite Duras. Then a final bus from My Tho took us to frenetic Ho Chi Minh City. I went straight to the airport for my flight to Singapore, where I had just enough time for a swim in Changi airport’s rooftop pool before continuing to London. My first trip to Asia was over.

But look – there’s just one small crumb of peanut brittle left in the packet...

First published in VISA 87 (Oct 2009)


Sunday, 29 March 2015

Tales from the Temples

by John Keeble

Some say the events in the killing fields of Cambodia, in which around two million people died at the hands of Pol Pot's Khmer Rouge in the seventies, were then the latest drama unfolding in the sacred politics of Angkor's temples.
Angkor Wat

In essence, the theory is based on Pol Pot dreaming of turning back the clock to an agrarian society after linking his knowledge of the Khmers' great empire days with a theory that their economic life was founded on sacred lakes and the pulsing of the natural Tonle Sap lake producing enormous quantities of rice on the Angkor plain.

A thought like that makes you gasp, like a sudden fall through a trapdoor. But, as you walk through the living death of Angkor's temples - including the world's largest sacred building, Angkor Wat itself - you can somehow imagine the theory to be right; the tragedy of the 20th century as a legacy of the misleading mysteries that underpinned the power of the Khmer rulers from the ninth to the fifteenth centuries.

That strange world is there for you to read in the sacred fabric of sandstone, the carvings in rivers, and the statuary of gods and demons churning beautiful apsara - the dancing girls of heaven - from the cosmic milk of life.

It is a strange, haunting story too. Of politics and power first; of religion and art as a means of control; of wars, victories and defeats in the pursuit of wealth and glory; of great inventions in engineering and agriculture... and of the idea, just one, that started it all and turned to stone in edifices as tall as Notre Dame and bigger than Egypt's greatest pyramid.

That idea was the 'god-king': the indivisible blend of the king and the gods of a tailored cult based on Shiva worship and Hinduism. Later, when Shiva failed to protect the Khmers from the Chams, the new cult used Buddha instead. But the idea stayed the same: the king was the gods' representative on Earth and everyone must obey. The result was the growth of an empire, with a ferocious army, a stable and powerful political organisation, centralised and uniform society, excellent techniques for rice production - and all of these were informed by deep religious beliefs and artistic genius focused almost entirely on its expression through religious building and decoration.
Banteay Srie

It was the apex of a civilisation that started from the dynamic mix of local people and the ideas of Indian traders and Indian-influenced Chams from Vietnam - they introduced Hindu ideas and art that gained strength from the 5th century and fuelled the rise of the Khmer empire.
In 802, Jayavarman II began the building era as the first 'god king' embodying the power and virtues of Shiva. He declared independence from Java and set himself up as king. He built a 'temple mountain' at Phnom Kulen, 40 miles east of Angkor, to represent Shiva's mythical Mount Meru - today's Cambodians regard the mountain as the most sacred in the country.
By the 10th century, Angkor art was emerging from its Cham origins and the most beautiful of all the temples was built at Banteay Srie, the Shrine of the Women. This Hindu temple, dedicated to Shiva, was the greatest achievement of artists in the 10th century. Each of the pink sandstone buildings was distinctive with inventive architecture and decoration - there were mythical guardian animals and a structural vibrancy that still rocks the senses.

Through the 11th century, the water from the hills flowed in blessed vitality and the bizarre seasonal backward flow of the Mekong and Tonle Sap river continued to quadruple the size of the lake to provide an amazing bounty of fish and crops. The well-fed population was on its way to one million when London boasted only 35,000. And, of course, wealth and people accumulated for expansion into neighbouring regions and for labour on the temples.

In the 12th century, the ambitions of the god-king, Suryavarman II, knew such awesome bounds that he created the world's largest sacred building - Angkor Wat. But the burden of building was immense - and in 1177, the Chams took advantage of a struggling state and the Khmer army being all but destroyed by jungle fevers, and captured Ankor, destroying the city and ruining many temples. The Khmers took their revenge in 1181 after a series of ferocious battles on the lake and canals; they went on to conquer Champa (in what is now Vietnam) and building a new capital, Angkor Thom - “the great city” - surrounded by a eight-miles moat. And, because the Hindu gods had not protected them in the past, the new protector would be Buddha.
Bayon

The biggest monument, Bayon - which means Buddha - was built around 1200 in the centre of Angkor Thom. It has216 faces of the omnipresent deity watching over the temple and the people - its 54 towers, with the coldly smiling Buddha faces, coincide with the 54 provinces of that time. Historians believe it was the intention to intimidate the people of the far-flung settlements with the all-seeing watchfulness...the faces were a blend of the god-king and Buddha.

Angkor Thom was the last major work, the height of the empire with the most people and the most power: then it began a slow decline, having reached the limits of its water supply and the land available on the plain of its birth. By 1430, nearly all of Angkor had been abandoned - only Angkor Wat remained in use as a Buddhist shrine. After the empire fell, the jungle reclaimed much of the land and it was not until the French colonial explorers found it in the 1860s that there was any attempt at restoration - its full extent was not realised until aerial surveys were flown after the Second World War.

While many think Angkor is just Angkor Wat, the extent of the architectural wonder stretches over scores of temples, many huge, and the sacred networks of canals, rivers and lakes.
Today's Khmers have much to thank their ancestors for: Siem Reap, the city nearest the historic site, thrives unusually well for Cambodia and there is currently a boom in luxury hotel building. It looks like the organisation of historic area into a coach-party tour centre will be completed before the end of this decade.

But while some benefit in money, others find other contentments.

The shrines, everywhere at Angkor, are alive with the worship of people. An altar here, a broken shrine there; a fragment of an icon, a huge Buddha or Vishnu ... there are always people, the wax of candles, the flower, the fragrance of incense. The old ways may be dead, but the sacredness lives on in the people.

Others are enjoying a social role, like those reviving and extending Cambodian dance. As part of the restoration of Preah Khan - the Temple of the Sword with corridors and chambers in a square some half a mile by half a mile - the World Heritage Fund has been paying for a dance teacher for local youngsters.

Prean Khan
Originally, dance was taught at the palace and then as a state art. But the Pol Pot years destroyed the system and mostly saw the murder of the people who ran it and performed in it. Dancers and trainers who fled to Thailand kept the dances alive by teaching and performing them in the refugee camps until they could return to Phnom Penh. Now, the Preah Khan group is among those working on the traditions of dance, music and dress.

And their teacher has been visiting the villages to collect the folk dances that tell the stories of life, work on the land, religious beliefs and the seasons. Now, in Preah Khan's Hall of Dancers they perform for chosen audiences. The mortal apsara in royal splendour, and shy village lads finding shy village girls in age-old stories in paddy fields.

The god-kings are no more than ghosts in the miles of sacred stone. But life goes on ...

**
Angkor Wat is one of more than 70 temples that fit into a sacred pattern of rivers, canals and lakes and make the sacred plain of Angkor one of the wonders of the world. Here are some of the temples to see:

Angkor Wat
Built between 1113 and 1150, it is the physical representation of Hindu cosmology adapted into Khmers' unique beliefs - it is the best example of the temple mountain, used over and over again in the Khmer building.

An enclosing quadrangle symbolises the world ringed by mountains with endless oceans (the moat, 190m wide, 1.5km by 1.3km around the quadrangle) beyond; in the centre, the five lotus-bud peaks of the celestial Mount Meru where the gods live through cycles of destruction and creation. There are 12,000 bas-relief carvings portraying religious scenes, the history of the Khmers and 1,700 figures of the celestial dancers, the apsaras, who awaited the lucky in heaven. The wat has the usual east-west orientation - but what is unusual is that it faces west, the death aspect, and this has convinced many that it was both a temple and a royal mausoleum.

Bayon
Bayon is one of the most mysterious of the Angkor temples: its 54 towers each has four faces to watch over the cardinal points - all the faces are the same, the serene but watchful blend of Buddha and the builder, Jayavarman VII, constantly watching everyone in the 54 provinces.
In contrast with Mount Meru of Angkor Wat, Bayon is a model of the kingdom. But beyond this, it is also the spiritual centre - literally the centre of the 10 square miles of Angkor Thom and its sacred buildings and waterways. Jayavarman VII, Angkor's greatest king, built it after the Chams were defeated: it was the City of Angkor which would never fall again to an invader. Except, of course, it eventually did. The city and its huge temples were encircled by a 100 metre wide moat once inhabited by crocodiles and an 8 metre wall. It has five monumental gates - one each to the north, west and south and two in the direction of life. Bayon is decorated with thousands of bas-reliefs of religious and military scenes, including the defeat of the Cham army.

River of a Thousand Lingas
This quiet river flows down from the Kulan hills - part of Shiva's creative powers to irrigate the Angkor plain as a favour to the king. The walk through the jungle is part of the charm of the visit. But it is the river bed, sculpted with lingas and images of Shiva, that makes it worthwhile.

Ta Prohm
This is one of the most visited temples after Angkor Wat and Bayon - it has been only partly restored to show how the jungle had reclaimed the temples before work revealed their old magnificence. About 12 feet of loam was removed from around the roots. It was built 1186 as a Buddhist temple - it is so huge (like others) that 80,000 people were required to attend to the temple and maintain it, including 2,700 officials and 615 dancers.

Banteay Srie
The Shrine of the Women was dedicated to Shiva when it was built in the 10th century. It was the greatest achievement of artists of the time. The pink sandstone and mythical creatures still rock the senses.

Perhaps most captivating of all - and another of the enduring images of Angkor - are the apsaras, the page three girls of the Khmer period. The apsaras were the erotic beauties waiting for the good in heaven but, also, they had an earthly presence too, because they could visit the mortal, they were seen in court and temple dancing, and their representation - thousands of them - were all different, showing the (extremely scanty) clothing of the time, the fashionable jewellery and hairstyles. As the sun falls into the kingdom of death at the end of the day, the warm rays and the subtle pink of the sandstone still bring the apsaras to life at the Shrine of the Women.

Preah Khan
The temple of the Sacred Sword was built in the late 12th century. It has miles of narrow stone corridors, centring on a Shiva linga, and towards the back a beautiful open area that links to the Hall of Dancers where the lucky may find the local dance troupe performing - not for money, but for prestige groups organised by the World Heritage Fund, which is paying for the temple’s restoration. It was dedicated to 515 divinities and had 18 major festivals a year - needing thousands of people to maintain and run it.

First published in VISA issue 48 (winter 2002).

Thursday, 11 December 2014

Eternally changing

By John Keeble
There are two manmade tourist photo ops from space -- I am here at one of them, Angkor Wat.

Just a quick visit this time. Enough time to snatch some good photos, note the big changes since my last visit 10 years ago, eat some great food.

The biggest changes are the way that temple access has been organised. Most temples now have 'way of visit' and 'possibilities of visit' routes that take in the important aspects but constrain the earlier freedom.

I enjoyed the new organisation - quite the opposite to what I usually find attractive - and happily went along with it because, despite the 'routes', there was still the fun and adventure. You can still wander off and break your neck easily enough: they are safe enough but without the paternal claptrap of developed countries' Health & Safety rules.

This is the start of the tourist season and it is possible to get pictures without others in the frame if you want that. For me, the people and their interaction are as interesting as the history of the temples.

This year, there are many Asian tourists, not just beautifully dressed but wonderfully colourful and enjoying their taste of travel with an enthusiasm that restrained 'seen it all before' Western tourists rarely show.

I flew in from Chiang Mai via Bangkok three days ago ... later today, I will take a taxi to the border with Thailand. I need to meet people at Sa Kaeo, about 30km into Thailand, by 10pm.


Dawn at Angkor Wat ... how could anyone miss that?






Sunset over the Angkor plain ... fun, crowded, maybe even a glimpse of sunset